Will pay polluting the sky
26 December 2011 Radikal
] You will have to obtain carbon dioxide release certificate of companies that flight to the European countries [
European Court signed a decision that protects the environment. The court ruled that emission trade is legitimate. Emission trading is one of the main measures that the right to sell carbon dioxide emissions and get income from it, to reduce the atmospheric gases of the European Union. The final decision from the European Court of Justice shows that this application will be more common. Thus, participating in emission trade for all international airline companies has become an obligation. The European Court of Justice returned the complaint of the American Airlines Union with Canadian and American airline companies in this direction. Thus, companies have to purchase carbon dioxide release certificate for all aircraft from Europe to shield or in Europe since 2012. If the main center of the company is not in the European Union, it will not create an exception.
International companies will also be required to purchase certificates for a part of carbon dioxide release.
[The LAW WAR
]]The exit point of companies applying on the road was the prosecution of the third countries prescribed to be taken and violated the "Open Section Agreement". However, the Court of Justice, which does not accept these claims, noted that the application covers all flights that enter and exit the European Union airfield. The Open Section Agreement, aimed at blocking the mutual victim of European and American companies, also noted that the European and American companies do not violate the right of domination as they are interested in all airline companies. It was expressed that flights from outside the European airfield are not subject to the application of the mortar, which still goes to a range outside of Europe.
However, on the other hand, the mortar application aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions and keeping under control is not connected to a common arrangement in European Union countries. For example in long-distance flights in Germany, you need to pay 40 euros per flight, while in the UK, this fee is about 120 euros. The international companies that will participate in the emission trade also exceed the purchase of certificates for a part of carbon dioxide emissions from January Tags. Peter Liese, a member of the Parliament of the European Union Parliament, is much less than the national regulations of its cost to international companies: "According to the calculations we have, the cost arising from Frankfurt during a flight from New York is only 45 cent. This is because 85 percent of this certificate will be distributed for free. Therefore the price of the certificate is low. However, there are explanations as the prices will rise. This can be two reasons. One of those who want to increase ticket prices through the certificate free of the airline. However, if prices are rising so, these passengers are bloody. Or there is an excessive fleet of these companies.
]] In2012, SERTIFAKAS WILL BE FREE IN THE SURFACE
In2012, the European Union announced that the airline companies will distribute 85 percent of their carbon emission certificates for free was heard that emissions jeans on this rate may be purchased via the Emission Trading System or by an open increase in charge. 85 percent rate on the face was determined by the average of the aircraft number in the European Union. If they reduce their fleet, they will take less liability. However, the certificate rate to be distributed for free is planned to be lowered in the future, which is the case of the introduction of incentives, and in this case, the cost arising from Frankfurt to New York will not exceed 1 euro.
AB, RAHATLESS
European Union, without disturbing the US’s willingness to protect the environment. The European parliamentary Peter Liese evaluates the complaint made to the Court of Justice, as a proof of the protection of the climate of the US Barack Obama ciddiye. Liese, who stated that the US President Barack Obama struggles to protect the climate, was one of the important grounds of Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, "However, it is necessary to detect, unfortunately, not a difference between the management of Obama with Bush. Therefore, we are protected our stability. If we want to take a leading role in climate protection, we should clearly reveal our legal regulations.
]Click here to reach the details of
Source: News