What kind of relationship between the climate crisis with our Sevens?

According to a new research from Oxford University by scientists and published in Nature Food magazine, vegan nutrition greatly reduces the damage of food production to the environment. Experts note that this research is the most comprehensive analysis ever made, and how our seven people influence our planet, it contains the most reliable calculations. The effect of high and low amount of meat consumption on greenhouse gas emissions is clearly determined for the first time. The meat industry that reacts to the research suggests that the study reduces the impact of meat consumption.

] Over 55 thousand diets were reviewed]
In the study of the diet of more than 55 thousand people in the UK, data about 38 thousand farms in 119 countries were also used to investigate differences in the influence of certain foods produced in different conditions. In the study, people consume a high amount of meat (a 100g or a large hamburger on the day), they consume a small amount of meat (in the day 50g or two small sausages), fish consumes, vegetarians and veganlar categories. [

Et consumption leads to more greenhouse gas release
According to research; the diet of people who consume a high amount of meat leads to an average of 10,24 kg of greenhouse gas release every day. For those who consume less meat, this amount drops to 5.37 pounds. 2.47 weight if Vegan fed people produce daily greenhouse gas. Prof. Dr. Oxford University, speaking to BBC, managing research. Peter Scarborough reduces the amount of meat anyone who consumes a high amount of meat in the UK according to the results, can really make a big difference. You don’t need to remove meat from your diet completely” says.

The environmental footprint of our waste
According to Prof. Susan Jebb, President of Oxford University Food Standards Agency and leading nutrition experts in the world, meat production was previously detected, which has a greater environmental footprint than plant-based foods, but never calculated in detail. Jebb, which is not included in the research, spoke as follows: "This makes it unique to work, based on the diets of real people and evaluate the existing food production methods. The researchers examined the environmental footprint of our seven people in a much more detail compared to previous studies. "
]
Detailed first work[
Oxford University research is the first study that examines our nutrition habits in detail other environmental impacts outside the greenhouse gas release. These land use, water usage, water pollution and often loss of species caused by habitat loss in the expansion of agricultural areas. They consume a high amount of meat in each scenario, have a significantly higher negative effect than other groups. Nick Allen, CEO of British Meat Processors Association, suggests that such assessments are missing. Allen, "This study is looking for emissions from livestock only. It does not take into account that the carbon in agriculture is drawn by grassland areas and trees. He says that the data will probably appear a different table if it is interested in account.
[
responsible for the three of the food production emissions
Nick Allen’s words to answer Prof. Scarborough says that a number of researches, including their own work, the withdrawal of carbon dioxide by grassland areas only has a ‘midable effect’. A separate study published in Nature Food magazine in 2021 was determined that all global greenhouse gas emissions of food production are responsible for three. Prof. According to Jebb, most people know that they should not consume more products such as sweet, because of their health concerns, but there is no common thought for meat. Jebb knows that "People should not eat cakes and biscuits to prevent the disease. They may not want to hear this but they know it is right. They are not completely convinced about meat" says. Jebb adds that the government should support farmers in the transition process, as well as to promote people to change their diets.