Results From Bali: 2 Years Kaybettik in Climate Change
21.12.2007 Bianet[
The Climate Change Summit, which took place on December 3-14 in the island of Indonesia, with the participation of member states of the member states, was judged by Ayten Ayseven, bianet.
[[T]]Ayseven says the peak is focused on the United States (USA) of positive or negative results. "The purpose of Zirve was to be upgraded in the direction of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the targets in the Kyoto Protocol. But as a result, goals were not raised. " [ [[T][6]]Two years more to get dark steps... ]Ayseven "The peak of the US, which is the largest oil country before and has the most important share in climate change, was going into the process; it was predicted. That’s not positive.”
The climate change peak that the U.S. has not been blocked, which was intended for the U.S.. "I promised that the U.S. process will be part, but it has not been subjected to harsh sanctions. As a result, the improvement of the goals was to lead to the removal of stable steps. However, there is no improvement in the meeting to be held in Denmark in 2009.
Ayseven "We lost time, we do not have a luxury like it, the situation is critical, the warnings of science environment in this direction," drawing a significant loss in the fight of climate change of two years.
The call of Ayseven, who says that Turkey is already a very back country in the fight of climate change:
"I need more than ever before the pressures to be applied to globally policy makers in the fight of change. Compliant to governments, oppressive activism is outstanding.
[What happened inBali?]
[The text adopted inBali initiates a 2-year negotiation process for the creation of the new agreement document, which will replace the Kyoto Protocol in 2012. The process will end with a conference to be held in Copenhagen in 2009. In the climate conference, it was connected to the decision to start negotiations for the new agreement that will replace the Kyoto Protocol. However, the proposal for binding restrictions was adopted to reduce carbon gas emissions due to the appeals of the US. The UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that the 2 weeks of conference is not satisfied with the progress provided. The European Union wants to reduce the percentage of carbon emissions that create greenhouse effect up to 2020 by 25 to 40 percent, while the U.S. comes from bringing numerical restrictions.
]]]]Source: News