Bergama Villaged One Time More But...

21.02.2008 NTVMSNBC

Izmir Barosu, the Council of Ministers left the case for the cancellation of the decision of 29 March 2002, which allowed the gold mine to be guaranteed using cyanide in Bergama; Danesi 6 and 8. The shared share of the apartments also canceled the decision of the Council of Ministers.

[[T]]Davalı Prime Ministerial decision, the file to the Board of Administrative Case Apartments. The Committee rejects the appeal of Prime Ministership, reclaims the decision of the joint. After that decision, the Prime Minister has the right to “stable correct” prompt. But this prompt will style connect to the same Board decision. [[[T]] [[T][6][Avukat Özay: life decisions are not applied!

]]]]]

Eh Özay, who has been a lawyer of Bergama peasants for 15 years, has decided of the Board of Administrative Case Apartments NTVMSNBC. There are numerous decisions such as this decision, but the mine will stop its operation, there is no launch of a kind of application to cancel:

]]

“We received numerous courtesy of the gold mine in Bergama in 15 years. Although we have received this last court, the capacity of this is increased by 3 times and they continue to work by eating gold soil from Kaziya, Uşak, Gümüşhane, Kas and Sivrihisar. So where can we sound in the state of the Republic of Turkey where life decisions are rested? There were dozens of decisions to date but the result did not change. The nerves of the people of the people were laçka. The European Court of Human Rights has received compromise but the compliance note important, note the violations. The court decisions in Turkey are not implemented: the European Court of Human Rights, you do not apply decisions, so asked the account, but there was nothing change. [

]

I'm Lazm of the Caesar of the Hell and the NGO]

Özay, who expresses that the public and civil society needs to be higher than the voice: “Kamuoyu, Barolar Association, Natural Association, and organizations like the Association of Naturals would say ‘yeter’, something does not change. The company continues its work, so the decision taken today has no thanks. When they will not list to this decision. The lawyers will be expected to meet with this court decision in the day of ’30, they will say ‘satin’ on 29th day but 32. The day, ‘Aa, there is a new transaction, the Ministry of Environment, the Governorship or the philosopher institution allowed, and they will continue again.

]]The Board of Fans 3 times 'hided decision'[

]]]]

Aukat Özay has no difference in the application between the government today with governments pasted in this regard: “A thing is that; 3 times hidden decision was decided by the Council of Ministers. Another with cement was related to yacht thermal power plants. We have canceled them, he went to Strasburg, we decided to obey. The third was the secret decision dated 2002. We did not find this decision, said ‘hid’ in Turkey. We received the decision from AIHM and put the case against him. At the end, Daniztay decided, but they did not follow the decisions. Now, the Administrative Case Apartments Board has made such a decision, but there is no point on which it is necessary to apply. When in Turkey, there is no one who killed the law state. "

]]

]]] if theAnkaraans support Istanbul]

]]]]]]]] [[

Youih Özay says that he did not lose the umid anyway: “The people of the people, peasants, environmentalists and sensitive citizens are standing. Best women and children meet very much. Current, the number of refugees given me from the noteer was 2758, drafted 651. There is sensitivity to the region, but Ankara dotian do not support Istanbul Municipality. Turkey’s largest, best law, was the file that was expected with lifestyle decisions, but there is no support. If the community has interest, these court decisions are also implemented. There is no sentence to compliance with the court decision in the legal state, which is only in Turkey. There is no such term in English in German.

AiHM justified peasants twice]

] [

After the consumption of internal law road relateding to gold mine in Bergama, the villagers who go to the European Court of Human Rights have won twice. In the first decision on November 10, 2004, AİHM had justified the fight of peasants from two points. Accordingly, the court had a violationd the European Convention for Human Rights (AiHS)8, also considered the current national court decisions of Turkish governments. In addition, 15 October 1997, the decision of the Economic Court of İzmir, which was held by Danicitay in 1 April 1998, reported the Para 1 of the 6thmadde of AİHS.

Köylular had a record draft

AiHM had a record prototype to Turkey in March 28, 2006. A total of 945 thousand Euros of spiritual appetite in Bergama, protesting gold removal in Ovacık Gold Mine.

[

AiHM had found the 8th article of the European Human Rights Agreement, which allowed the government to operate gold mine by considering the decisions of the Turkish life.

[

AiHM also had been taken on October 15, 1997 on the Izmir Troy about Ovacık mine, and was not implemented by the government of the period of the decision to stop the business approved in 1998 by Danicitay. [

[

He tells that the Presidency of Ministers of the period in the reclaim of the IHM had no legal basis of the decisions taken in relation to the processing of the made, which roulette is that this situation is expected to the law. [

[email protected]